Oct 15, 2021 08:41 AM
by Carlo Veltri
I'm currently using the "duplicate window" option to see multiple series on 2 Monitor.
But it would be a great implementation to be able to set automatic opening on two monitors (with different options for CT, MR and RX for example).
You are doing a great job... with the addition of some features it would become a perfect software!
Oct 18, 2021 09:02 PM
by
We strive to make RadiAnt a perfect piece of software. Multi-monitor support + hanging protocols will be certainly added in future versions.
Nov 12, 2021 12:58 PM
by Carlo
Thanks! Good work
May 17, 2022 02:22 PM
by Manuel Villa
Hey! Any news on Multi-monitor setups? Haven't heard about it here for a while. Thnaks!
May 26, 2022 11:06 PM
by
Hi. We chose to not share any time-frames for the planned features until their release in a beta version is imminent.
Jan 31, 2023 04:21 PM
by Thomas B
Hello,
Have you got some news about multi monitor feature ?
It would be great if we can have an option in options.xml to have "Duplicate Window" mode by default at startup.
Sep 13, 2023 08:05 PM
by
Hi,
Our data shows that most of RadiAnt users have a single monitor. Which makes a multi-monitor feature a bit less prioritized than the other ones.
Jun 9, 2024 01:44 AM
by Pedro
Please prioritize multi-monitor setup. Many of us, radiant users, use multi monitor setups. Would be great!
Jun 10, 2024 09:40 PM
by boskar
I see two possible quick-and-not-that-dirty solution here:
1. Duplicate the already opened Radiant window (without reopening/redownloading studies) - I can drag the window to the second screen by myself, but opening the duplicated window in the second screen sounds like an easy task anyway
2. Poor man's dual screen - one of Your polish comptetitors (with CE mark) provides the dual screen workstation as "joined together" in the GPU driver (mosaic mode). Works with radiant too, although, that software by design if two (or any even number) viewports are open horizontally splits the window exactly in half (just by not having any sidebars).
Both solutions sound like an relatively easy task that could partially meet the demand here.